Student
Background:
The student I worked with for the QRI 5 assessment is a
second grader who we will refer to as Andrew, he is a Caucasian male who is
showing signs of having difficulty with comprehension and is in the processing
of being tested. He is a sweet funny child who is happy just about all the time
and is a chatterbox. He does stutter when he speaks and sometimes looses his
train of thought and says “ what was I saying?” I notice during a read along
the teacher was asking questions and when called on him and he did not know
what was read, he just made something up.
On numerous of times I would work with him during guided reading and
after a page I will ask for him to retell me what he just read and could not.
He would honestly guest majority of the time. I was happy that I was able to do
this assessment on him.
Assessment:
Word List:
I started to work at the premier level because the teacher
stated this would be good so I can see his progress in the words. Andrew went
through the words so quick with a score of 100; I went to the next level and
the same. He went to level three and had some trouble scoring 17 out 20. I
thought this was a good time to stop. He had to pronounce and think of the
words and stated, “Wow these words are harder and what does this mean”. I think Andrew being in the third level is
good because he is only in the second grade. The more he is interested in
expanding his vocabulary and their definitions it expands his knowledge.
Expository:
Being that Andrew has great vocabulary and is able to
pronounce his words efficiently he cannot retain or comprehend what we read. He
read the passage “The Family’s First Trip” and only had a total of 1 miscues,
which placed him in the independent level. However when Andrew had to retell
the story he only gave me one fact from the story and drifted off topic. When
answering the questions He did not do so well either, some questions were
answered half way and he just did not know. I feel if Andrew reads slower, takes his time
to understand what he has read and stopped after each paragraph to summarize
what he read then the retelling and answering questions would have been easier.
Questions that were answered without looking back to the story put in in a
frustration level and questions answered looking back placed him in the
Instructional level.
Reflection:
After assessing Andrew I feel with vocabulary and reading
with fluency he is right on target with his grade level. However Andrew needs
to develop more skill in comprehension and retelling what he has read. The key
is to find numerous way he can achieve this in order to retain important
information.
To help his
comprehension I would let Andrew do daily activities that involve reading and
comprehension. Some applications like Raz-Kids.com are great for this. If
Andrew is called on in class to read the teacher should have him explain what
he just read and not move on to another student. The teacher can also have
another in small groups where you can work one to one with him. Another option
for Andrew is when reading highlight important key facts in each story. Overall
he did good but if this continue, ,when testing him not comprehending questions
can lead to him not doing well.
Even though
I was not able to work with two students because the teacher in the upper grade
did not allow it. I believe working with Andrew was sufficient enough and gave
me a understand of the QRI-5. It also was fun and easy to do administer. I
think because of Andrew’s personality the assessment went very smooth and
funny. He enjoyed pronouncing the words very much.
Lesson Plan:
Candidate’s Name: Erika Garcia
Grade Level: 2nd Grade
Title of the lesson: Practicing
Comprehension
Length of the lesson: 30 minutes on
weekly bases and at home.
Central focus of the lesson: Student will practice on
comprehending short stories and questions. Students will work on this weekly
to improve his comprehension level and exceed to his grade level.
Knowledge of Students:
Student will have an
understanding of reading with fluency and pronouncing grade level words.
|
Key questions:
·
Why is it important to understand what we
read?
·
How can we break up a passage?
·
How do we refer back to the story to look for
key details?
|
Common Core State Standards
Read
grade-level text with purpose and understanding.
Read grade-level text orally with accuracy, appropriate rate,
and expression on successive readings.
Use
context to confirm or self-correct word recognition and understanding,
rereading as necessary.
|
Support literacy development through language
The lesson is to reinforce great
reading skill to achieve the goal of comprehending what was read.
Vocabulary
·
Familiar and
new words that are being read in the stories.
Sentence
Level
● Sentence
structure, transitions/connectives, complex verb tenses
Discourse
● Text
structure, rereading the material as many times before understanding it and
moving on.
|
Learning objectives
1.
Student will be able to comprehend what they read.
2.
Student will be able to answer questions
3.
Students will be able to break down the story to make
it a better understanding for them.
|
Formal and informal assessment
·
Student answering questions correctly and
accordantly to the passage they read.
·
Student moving on to the next level on
Raz-Kids
·
Student being able to read and answer
questions on their own with minimal help during class activities (guided
reading groups)
|
Instructional procedure:
1. The teacher will start the lesson by reviewing
different ways we can enhance our comprehension level and what to look for
while reading.
2. We will then move on to log in to Raz-Kids.com.
Students will be given instructions to follow and will get assistance if
needed. The teacher will walk through the steps on the smart bored as well in
cases students get lost. This is also
another form of reading techniques.
3. Prior to students logging in the teacher assigned
them to different levels in Raz-kids. The teacher gets an assessment after
each short story the student has read. They cannot go on to the next level
unless the teacher movies them up.
4. Students will do this for two week straight once a
day.
5. The teacher will retest for comprehension after two
weeks, and compare the results from the QRI 5 to the assessment on Raz-Kids
6. Students will continue using this for the rest of
the year and hopefully show room for improvement and continue going up the
levels.
|
Instructional resources and materials
·
Ipad / Computer
·
Raz-Kids.com
·
QRI-5 assessment
·
Smart board
|
Reflection
·
Was the student able to learn new learning
techniques on improving their comprehension level?
·
Did the teacher give enough time to retest for
the assessment?
·
Was the student able to probably navigate Raz-Kids.com?
|
No comments:
Post a Comment